After learning about biodiversity and cultural diversity, I believe that biodiversity and cultural diversity are related, but do not rely as heavily on each other today, as they have in the past. In ancient cultures, plants and animals were viewed as sacred because they were so important to staying alive. With the introduction of globalization, the need for the once “sacred” plants and animals were replaced by new and equally valuable, if not more valuable items. The resources that people did have were then used to trade with others and the cycle continues today. We can see proof of this through Wade Davis’s presentation because cultures in which globalization has not had an impact, still view their biodiversity as sacred and a necessity to their cultural survival.
I do find those cultures beautiful and very rich in spirituality and richness of culture which is why I believe that they should be protected, as needed, by the governments of the regions they are located. Even everyday cultures need to be protected from persecution and fear of depletion because cultural diversity is what binds us to our spiritualty and our closeness to nature and things less worldly. With funding and legislation from governments, these unique cultures are not only protected, but also cherished. The diversity of the population and the government will be able to see eye to eye and work hand in hand to promote peaceful living as well as cooperation and respect for one another.
While promoting new and modern culture is an option that I have thought about, I do not find it to be the best way to preserve the identity of individuals and their bond with the earth and the biodiversity it sustains. The thought process to let cultural diversity die out and create a melting pot effect is logical, and in some areas necessary, such as creating a basis of a common language. But the real focus should lie in harmonious interactions while individual beliefs and cultures may stay intact and strong. Our uniqueness and diversity is what keeps us strong and connected to the things we find sacred in nature and in life in general.
I do find those cultures beautiful and very rich in spirituality and richness of culture which is why I believe that they should be protected, as needed, by the governments of the regions they are located. Even everyday cultures need to be protected from persecution and fear of depletion because cultural diversity is what binds us to our spiritualty and our closeness to nature and things less worldly. With funding and legislation from governments, these unique cultures are not only protected, but also cherished. The diversity of the population and the government will be able to see eye to eye and work hand in hand to promote peaceful living as well as cooperation and respect for one another.
While promoting new and modern culture is an option that I have thought about, I do not find it to be the best way to preserve the identity of individuals and their bond with the earth and the biodiversity it sustains. The thought process to let cultural diversity die out and create a melting pot effect is logical, and in some areas necessary, such as creating a basis of a common language. But the real focus should lie in harmonious interactions while individual beliefs and cultures may stay intact and strong. Our uniqueness and diversity is what keeps us strong and connected to the things we find sacred in nature and in life in general.